![]() ![]() Blackmagic wants to become the go-to place for all things post-production, and they are well on their way to making DaVinci Resolve a major program outside of color circles.ĭaVinci Resolve can be intimidating, as the color work is node-based - but there are a ton of tutorials online, and the amount is growing. The reason it makes the list for video editors - the latest version (12.5) includes a built-in NLE. DaVinci Resolveīlackmagic’s DaVinci Resolve is one of the industry standards for color work. Here are some of the best programs and plugins for video editors to make a quick color grade. You’re probably just looking for a quick way to get results that make your client happy. If you aren’t a full-time colorist, odds are you won’t be diving into the likes of FilmLight’s Baselight, AutoDesk Flame’s Lustre, or specific programs like REDCINE-X. These programs and plugins make the process faster and easier than ever. That's not to say that certain NLEs can't use GPU and memory more efficiently than others, just that what's good for one NLE will generally good for all NLEs.Color grading doesn’t have to be a mystery. Since GPU's have thousands of cores and even HD footage contains about 2.2 million pixels, this is an ideal task for them which is why a good GPU is so important for NLEs. When doing any sort of color grading or applying any kind of effects (this would also apply to transitions), an NLE will see the frame as an array of pixels with the given color grading or effect operation needing to be applied to be applied to each pixel usually without dependence on the previous pixel. You generally want a good amount of RAM and a good GPU with a decent amount of GPU memory.Įven with compressed footage or bayered footage, the frames that NLEs work on will be stored uncompressed and debayered in memory so that alone can quickly eat up system or GPU RAM. I'm just gonna repeat the sentiment that you need a better laptop but point out that that's true for any NLEs. I'm going to try to LW later, but ultimately, I just need a better machine to satisfy DR ![]() It is extremely fast and being a few 10ths of a second off will throw the video/sync off. But the one I'm working on now, is a guitar cover of myself playing with a death metal song. I haven't had too much of a problem with DR until now because I have been making "normal" videos for youtube. I even encoded some of my videos I was working with to a DR-friendly format, but it really didn't matter. And it doesn't seem to really matter what video format/codec I put it, it is all the same. I have tried to rollback to a previous version, but for some reason it wouldn't let me. One thing that helped me when I was using DR was I shrunk the preview window to like 14%. It took me into the wee hours of the night, but I love the result. Ultimately, I ended up using DR just because I love it and feel comfortable with it (despite not knowing a lot of basic functions). I tried LW a few years ago and I'll go back and revisit that as well. still a little laggy on my laptop but I think I'm going to look into it. From what I saw, it looked user-friendly and might re-visit it at another time but I am in a bit of a time crunch. Yesterday I tried Kdenlive, but right off the bat, it would not accept my. Hyper-V - Virtualization Enabled in Firmware No Hyper-V - Second Level Address Translation Extensions Yes F.43, ĭevice Encryption Support Reasons for failed automatic device encryption: PCR7 binding is not supported, Hardware Security Test Interface failed and device is not InstantGo, Un-allowed DMA capable bus/device(s) detected, Disabled by policy ![]() Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3360M CPU 2.80GHz, 2801 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)īIOS Version/Date Hewlett-Packard 68ICF Ver. Mark Grgurev wrote:What are the specs of your computer? I am willing to pay maybe up to around 100 USD if necessary. I never used the color correction, fairlight, etc. fusion-I love the professional look of the titles. Even on low settings, I still felt like there was no degradation from my original video. wav quality 1536 kbps audio quality in the rendered file. wav audio rendering (none of that 500-600 kbps compromises) I want. So until I get a new laptop, are there any alternatives you would recommend instead of DR? I am spending so much time on this that it until I get a new laptop, it probably isn't worth it. When it is not, it takes guess work and more rendering, watching, repeat,etc. I have to render everything, then watch the rendered file to see if everything is synced. I've done all of the tricks and tips to help with a smoother playback but I can't even see if my audio and video are syncing up. It is really powerful and that is part of the problem. After 9 months of working with it, I love DR. I know what you're thinking, "why would you post that on THIS forum?!!"ĭon't misunderstand. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |